Last One Standing Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Last One Standing - Assignment Example Overall, the company is moving with a delighted pace as it is working effectively with a comprehensive business strategy. The company has actually worked out in quality, style and service which are core features of its successive business strategy (Ryerson 3). Working in the rivalry aspect is most important for a company like Elmira which is present in small scale and is relying heavily on single product lines (appliances) to bring business success (Ryerson 3). Actually, working out in competition is the strength of Elmira and that is what describes its generic business strategy (Ryerson). Elmira has effectively filled the space of appliance manufacturing in Canada where major rivalries such as Whirlpool, Camco, Electrolux and Heartland Appliances have left wider space open for Elmira. It is through filling the space well in appliance manufacturing Elmira has out beaten its market competitors (Ryerson). This got possible through Elmira striving vision- striving for the core competencies which included a strong supply distribution network, competent employees, and effective production facility (Ryerson). It was through Elmira’s generic strategy (beating market competition), the company was able to secure its position in the market. And it was through this strategy it enabled the market prospect appear for the company in the coming years (Ryerson 3). It was after ten years of origin, the company Elmira Stove Works reached to its point of success. It was in 1986 when Elmira employed 120 employees, sold 10,000 units annually and was able to secure $12 million revenue (Ryerson 11). It was Elmira’s well adjustment to Ontario’s business environment (market environment) which allowed the company to drives its position in the regional market. This makes Elmira pass the fit test, which talks about a company’s suitable adjustment

Significance of Foucault in the Study of Sexuality Essay

Significance of Foucault in the Study of Sexuality - Essay Example In earlier days, supreme people had the right of life, as well as death over his subjects. This "right of life" was, in reality, a "right of death." The supremacy practiced by the supreme people was merely a matter of deciding whether a person would be killed or not (Foucault, 1978). In general, sovereign power executed itself as a form of "inference": it consisted of the authority to take things such as life, property, privileges and taxes away from its subjects. Today, the author suggests, power no longer affirms itself as an inference, but as a "right of death" (Foucault, 1978). The authority has power over life via the deaths that it can sway. The key interest of power, these days, is in life, and how to protect, expand and enhance it. Warfare is still waged, but they are not waged in support of the "right of death" of some supreme people, but are instead waged to guarantee a better means of life for humanity. As warfare has become bloodier, the death punishment has become less o ften. Also, while the death punishment was once a resentful act of obliteration, today it is perceived as a safeguard, as a means of eradicating a threat to society. Supremacy is now exercised solely over life and is practiced either to promote life or to prohibit it. Above any other element, Foucault perceives bio-power as liable for the rise of capitalism. Humanity came to be perceived as a vital factor in politics and history. How people live became an aspect of knowledge and power. The law became less concentrated in prohibiting and disbanding, and became more concerned in optimizing and normalizing the conditions of human life. Successfully, the new-fangled power over life that the author discusses signified that humanity fell under the control of politics. The first part of part V of this volume compares two diverse applications of power: the "power over life" and "right of death". The second part of part V of this volume shows why, with the increase of bio-power, sexuality ha s turned into such a vital concept to humanity. Comprehending the difference between the power over life and right of death will be much easier if individuals leave ethical judgments aside (Foucault, 1978). Instead of trying to consider which one is "better," people should simply accept that they are diverse and endeavor to emphasize the importance of these differences. In general, humans may distinguish power over life from the right of death by arguing that the latter is a harmful kind of power and the former is an encouraging form of power. During the era of complete monarchies (France’